Tuesday, June 29, 2010

Not the NFL

Are you not positive that if 22 FIFA 2010 World Cup soccer players played just one down of football, a running play in particular, that at least 18 players would be lying on the ground writhing in pain at the conclusion of the down?


Saturday, June 26, 2010

A Selected Timeline of the Obama Presidency

November 4, 2008 – Inexperienced junior Senator from the great state of Illinois, Barack Hussein Obama, is elected the 44th President of the United States of America.

January 20, 2009 – President Obama is inaugurated.

January 22, 2009 – President Obama issues an Executive Order to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba in one year.

March 27, 2009 – President Obama announces his new, comprehensive strategy for escalating the war in Afghanistan.

May 11, 2009 – President Obama announces he is firing his Afghanistan commander, Gen. David McKiernan, and replacing him with Obama’s hand-picked general, Gen. Stanley McChrystal.

August 30, 2009 – Gen. McChrystal submits a 66-page report to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates asking for additional troops in order to implement the Afghanistan war strategy announced by President Obama on March 27.

December 1, 2009 – After sitting on Gen. McChrystal’s report for more than 3 months, President Obama announces he will finally dedicate the resources requested by Gen. McChrystal to implement the new Afghan war strategy announced by President Obama on March 27.

June 23, 2010 - President Obama fires his hand-picked general who was faithfully executing President Obama's new, comprehensive strategy for Afghanistan; the fantastically ignorant widely declaring the new, comprehensive strategy in Afghanistan is owned by an aide to an aide to an aide of the President of the United States and Commander-in-Chief.

June 26, 2010 – The New York Times reports President Obama will not close the prison at Guantanamo Bay during his Administration. There are no reports of any street demonstrations in any city in the entire world protesting the imperialism of Obama’s Imperial Afghanistan Army; there are no reports of any street demonstrations in the entire world protesting Obama’s shredding of the Constitution and his global trashing of the good name of the United States of America.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

Afghanistan? What’s that?

And, yes, I can take a hint.

Mark me down as one who does not think Gen. Stanley McChrystal should be fired for comments his aides made to Rolling Stone magazine.

Instead, mark me down as one who does think President Obama should ask Vice President Biden to resign if the Vice President cannot get behind the President’s new, comprehensive counter-insurgency strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan (Af-Pak).

Mark me down as one who thinks Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry should be asked to Washington and asked to resign if he cannot get behind the President’s new, comprehensive counter-insurgency strategy for Af-Pak.

Mark me down as one who thinks Special Envoy Richard Holbrooke should be recalled to Washington and de-envoyed for I have no clue whatsoever as to his responsibilities. As in, if he has any, then what are Eikenberry’s?

As regular readers here know, I write quite a bit (when I write at all) about Afghanistan, especially in light of the impending Kandahar offensive. Just maybe this dust-up with McChrystal’s aides defending McChrystal will prompt people to assess President Obama’s new, comprehensive counter-insurgency strategy for Af-Pak that Obama first announced March 27, 2009, and not December 1, 2009 as some dishonest publications and propagandists would have people believe.

And just maybe this dust-up will prompt a honest assessment of who has been loyal to Obama’s new, comprehensive counter-insurgency strategy and who has not.

Hey, is that leak plugged, yet?

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

Vile Demagoguery of Liberal Extremists Exposed

Attached is a link to a piece by Leslie Gelb, who served in senior positions at State and Defense in the Johnson and Carter administrations so you get a sense of his lack of qualifications, which appeared in the Wall Street Journal on June 12:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703302604575294981386923908.html?mod=WSJ_latestheadlines

In the piece, Mr. Gelb argues that President Obama can benefit politically by moving Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over to Defense in the short term and then add her to the ticket for 2012. Gelb suggests Obama move Biden from the VP role to the State role, “a fitting capstone to an impressive career in public service”.

I’m not going to repeat Mr. Gelb’s thinking here, you can read the link for the asinine details.

Instead, I’m noting what’s not in the piece:

Madame Secretary and the Vice President voted for the war in Iraq.

Madame Secretary and the Vice President voted to fund the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with every vote they cast through September 2007.

Madame Secretary has presided over a State Department which has reasserted President Bush on the war in Iraq; the war in Afghanistan; the use of Predator drones in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen; state secrets; renditions; sanctions on Iran and Burma; Guantanamo; Six Party Talks; the Two-State solution; etc., etc., etc.

None of the reassertions of Bush/Cheney draw the slightest mention by Gelb, nor would they be acknowledged by any hypocritical liberal extremist (yes, the phrase is redundant).

As we see day after day, the liberals and Democrats were without any core convictions or principles in the run-up to the 2008 elections; there was no dead GI the liberals were not prepared to demagogue for a vote. Mr. Gelb suggests the liberals and Democrats remain coreless today and will so through 2012.

Friday, June 11, 2010

The Willful Suspension of (Logic and) Disbelief

So begins a piece, "U.S. Offensive Stalls in Key Afghan City", in today's Wall Street Journal:

"The commander of coalition forces in Afghanistan said the offensive in Kandahar is going more slowly than expected, in part because it still lacks the wholehearted support of the local population.

U.S. Gen. Stanley McChrystal's warning, delivered in Brussels at a meeting of North Atlantic Treaty Organization members, is the latest effort by military leaders to play down hopes for rapid progress in Afghanistan, where U.S. President Barack Obama would like to begin a drawdown of troops in July of 2011. The U.S.-led coalition has been ramping up operations in turbulent southern provinces since spring, with 30,000 additional U.S. troops to arrive this year. (End of the beginning of the WSJ article.)

McChrystal said, "I do think that (the pacification of Kandahar) will happen more slowly than we had originally anticipated. But I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing. I think it's more important we get it right than we get it fast."

So, all the troops ordered to Afghanistan by President Obama last December are not even in Afghanistan yet, the pace of operations envisioned back in December is behind schedule and the Wall Street Journal can still entertain Obama's fantasy of a draw down of a major military operation 13 months from now?

Hey, can someone get me Megan Fox's phone number?

Monday, June 07, 2010

Never Waste a Crisis III

Too funny.

Here's the opening few paragraphs of today's lead editorial in the Wall Street Journal:

Not too many weeks ago it looked as if President Obama's cap-and-tax program for energy was dead for this year. But with the political and media left whacking the President for his handling of the worst spill in U.S. history, Democrats have suddenly decided that this is one more crisis that shouldn't go to waste.

Consult Mr. Obama's remarks last Wednesday about "the future we must seize" at Pittsburgh's Carnegie Mellon. "The time has come, once and for all, for this nation to fully embrace a clean energy future," he said. "I want you to know, the votes may not be there now, but I intend to find them in the coming months."

Nancy Pelosi forced House Democrats to walk the cap-and-tax plank last July, and the White House now plans a summer push in the Senate, where Midwest and coal-state Democrats are still leery of imposing huge new energy costs on their constituents. But Democrats won't stop merely because cap and tax is unpopular and destructive. ObamaCare was too. (End of the first few paragraphs of the lead editorial in today's Wall Street Journal, Obama's Oil Crisis Politics, June 7, 2010.)

Sunday, June 06, 2010

Never Waste a Crisis II

For those who need a little more explanation of my June 3 post, here are some editorial comments from two different newspapers over the last two days:

Bud, Make It Perfect
June 4, 2010
The Wall Street Journal

Let's get the instant-replay issue out of the way first.

The average length of a Major League baseball game is already, what, something like eight or nine hours, or so it seems. So to avoid the chance of another perfect game stolen by a bad call, let's make the games longer by adding instant replay? No thanks. (End of the very beginning of the editorial from the WSJ.)


Oil Spill is a Sign to Congress: Kick the Fossil-fuel Habit
June 6, 2010
The Liberally-extreme Boston Globe

If the threat of global warming doesn’t persuade Congress of the need to reduce America’s reliance on oil and coal, the vast slick now befouling the Gulf of Mexico surely ought to.

The oil billowing out of BP’s Deepwater Obama site doesn’t just reveal the moral urgency of encouraging efficiency and renewable sources of energy; it also presents a leadership test. The Senate and the Obama administration must seize this moment to enact the Kerry-Lieberman energy and climate change bill, with its cap on utilities’ carbon dioxide emissions, its new controls on offshore drilling, and its investments in clean energy research and production. As a response to the ongoing catastrophe in the Gulf, putting a price on carbon emissions — a price that reflects the environmental damage caused by fossil fuels — makes much more sense than carping over whether President Obama has shown sufficient anger over the incompetence of BP.

Nearly a year ago, the House of Representatives passed its own energy and climate change bill. Since then, progress on the issue has stalled. Meanwhile, Americans have witnessed not just the BP debacle but also the worst coal-mining disaster in 40 years, the explosion in April at the Upper Big Branch mine in West Virginia that killed 29 workers.

The nation’s desperate need to extract fossil fuels has overwhelmed its ability to do so safely. Congress essentially acknowledged that by capping the amount of liability an oil company can incur in court; without the cap, drilling would appear too likely to damage people or the environment for anyone to actually invest in it.

Worse yet, recent fossil-fuel disasters pale against those that global warming may cause. As temperatures rise as a result of fossil-fuel consumption, the environmental consequences could be devastating. The world needs the United States to lead in limiting greenhouse gas emissions, or it will be impossible to expect action on this front from other major emitters like China, India, Brazil, and Indonesia.

Fossil fuels seem cheaper than alternative sources of energy only because oil companies and consumers have been spared the environmental costs. The human costs — in lives lost and livelihoods destroyed — are readily visible to all along the Gulf Coast. The BP spill makes the dangers of maintaining the status quo painfully clear. Beyond managing the current crisis, it is essential that the Senate pass a comprehensive energy law that steers the country in a cleaner, safer direction. (End of the entire editorial of the liberally-extreme Boston Globe, a "news"paper which never misses the opportunity to exploit disaster for political gain; who can forget the way the Boston Globe exploited the deaths of US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan in order to win an election after all?)

Thursday, June 03, 2010

Never Waste a Crisis

Deepwater Obama buring in the Gulf of Mexico, some 40 days ago.

Armando Galarraga about to complete the final out in his perfect game last night.