Saturday, November 01, 2008

Good-bye Israel!

The Los Angeles Times is not releasing a video where Sen. Barack Obama praised Rashid Khalidi, who served as a spokesman for the Palestine Liberation Organization when it was a U.S.-designated terror group.

Also present at the event where Sen. Obama praised the spokesman for a U.S.-designated terror group were domestic terrorists William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.

The Los Angeles Times endorsed Sen. Barack Obama for President of the United States of America.

Does anyone doubt for s second that if the video of Sen. Obama praising the spokeman for a U.S.-designated terror group helped the Senator that the Los Angeles Times would release the video? “See, look how Presidential Sen. Obama is!”

Given the cast of characters at this event and the anti-Israeli comments that the Los Angeles Times did report, can there be any doubt there were more harsh comments directed at Israel that were not reported?

I also suspect the video shows contact between Sen. Obama and domestic terrorists Ayers and Dohrn greater than “he’s just a guy from the neighborhood”.

When Sen. Joseph Biden says Sen. Obama is going to invite an international crisis that earns a U.S. response that many Americans will question, I wonder if the Americans doing most of the questioning will be Jewish Americans who had affinity for the former State of Israel.

Another McCain endorsement, it comes from an Iraqi war vet so I know it doesn't carry the weight of a former domestic terrorist like Bill Ayers but maybe it will get one or two people to consider voting for Sen. McCain:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TG4fe9GlWS8

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

In the "YouTube" age, why is the LA Times the only source for the video? Isn't there another outlet to get this thing? Or is the vast left-wing conspiracy in full swing?

12:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have alot of the same questions as hardball. Also, who would ever give a video to any news outlet and then ask that it not be shown? If the outlet chooses not to show it on their own, doesn't the source have another copy he could give to any other news media for publication? I don't understand what's really going on here.

12:48 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home