Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Delusional, Unhinged Liberals

My (news)paper, the Boston Globe, continues its hateful crusade against President Bush.

I'm not kidding, this is the asinine letter it published in yesterday's issue:

(Begin asinine letter)

RE "US seeks evidence for case against WikiLeaks founder” (Page A30, Dec. 16): I’m appalled but not surprised that the Justice Department under Attorney General Eric Holder is working assiduously to target Julian Assange and WikiLeaks. As the article states, “Justice Department officials have been struggling to come up with a way to charge Assange with a crime.”

This, of course, is the same Justice Department that has successfully struggled to come up with a way to ignore the crimes committed by members of the Bush administration against our Constitution, our laws, and a non-aggressive sovereign nation. If ever there was a rogue government that violated our nation’s laws and core beliefs, it was this bush-league bunch of troublemakers, and if we won’t shine the cleansing light of truth on their dirty deeds, then thank heavens there’s a WikiLeaks to do it for us.

Ultimately, it will be deeds done in the dark that cripple our moral authority and make a mockery of our Constitution. Attorney General Holder will do us all a favor if he points his dogs in a different direction, pursuing those who, operating under a cloak of secrecy, used their positions of power to validate and legalize wide-ranging acts of criminal behavior.

Paul Steven Stone, Cambridge

(End asinine letter by Paul Steven Stone, Cambridge)

What Paul Steven Stone does not know, or choose to ignore if he's not really as ignorant as he projects, and what the asleep-at-the-fact-checker letters editor at the Boston Globe does not know, or chooses to ignore if she/he is not really as ignorant as she/he projects, is that on September 8, 2010, the Ninth Circuit, literally the most liberally-extreme Court in the land, sided with President Obama and Attorney General Holder when they reasserted Bush's state secret arguments before that Court (Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan).

1 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are dead right on that one. If only Mr. Stone left his email address you could have enlightened him.

6:55 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home