Reno Requested Investigation
Quickly back to the aide of an aide of the President being indicted: what's up with the amnesia of those on the Left?
Again, today, for about the 50th time since the indictments last Friday, the Boston Globe is printing letters to the editor and allowing columnists to suggest the Clinton scandals were about his sexual relationship with an intern. Well, yes, to the extent we were trying to have a serious conversation about sexual harassment in this Country, I guess it was.
For Democrats and liberal extremists that are in deep, deep denial, the Clinton scandals were about a man (President Clinton) lying and obstructing justice in an attempt to frustrate a woman's (Paula Jones) sexual harassment suit. That he was involved in an extramarital affair is certainly between him, his girlfriend and his wife; no Republican or conservative cared. That he was engaged in the classic workplace sexual harassment scenario at the same time a woman was alleging sexual harassment against him is comical as much as the Left's acquiesence is sad. The Left is simply not offended by sexual harassment as long as the sexual harasser believes in abortion-on-demand. What a noble position. Plain and simply, President Clinton lied, obstructed justice and made false statements to frustrate the civil rights of a woman; the courts decide the merits of a sexual harassment lawsuit, not the defendant, his cronies and the massive machinery of the liberal media. Finally, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno asked for the investigation of the President, expanded the investigation of the President, and monitored and supervised the investigation's progress up to the President's bi-partisan impeachment in the House of Representatives.
I'm going to take a day for the liberals hyperventilating over the Judge Alito nomination to find some paper bags and calm down, then I'll be back for some, hopefully, intelligent comments on what the Left would have you believe is a "radical" judge. If you can't handle the graphic description of a scissor in the skull of an unborn baby you might want to miss my next post (oh, and yes, you'd be considered a "radical", too, for being offended by such a practice).
Quickly back to the aide of an aide of the President being indicted: what's up with the amnesia of those on the Left?
Again, today, for about the 50th time since the indictments last Friday, the Boston Globe is printing letters to the editor and allowing columnists to suggest the Clinton scandals were about his sexual relationship with an intern. Well, yes, to the extent we were trying to have a serious conversation about sexual harassment in this Country, I guess it was.
For Democrats and liberal extremists that are in deep, deep denial, the Clinton scandals were about a man (President Clinton) lying and obstructing justice in an attempt to frustrate a woman's (Paula Jones) sexual harassment suit. That he was involved in an extramarital affair is certainly between him, his girlfriend and his wife; no Republican or conservative cared. That he was engaged in the classic workplace sexual harassment scenario at the same time a woman was alleging sexual harassment against him is comical as much as the Left's acquiesence is sad. The Left is simply not offended by sexual harassment as long as the sexual harasser believes in abortion-on-demand. What a noble position. Plain and simply, President Clinton lied, obstructed justice and made false statements to frustrate the civil rights of a woman; the courts decide the merits of a sexual harassment lawsuit, not the defendant, his cronies and the massive machinery of the liberal media. Finally, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno asked for the investigation of the President, expanded the investigation of the President, and monitored and supervised the investigation's progress up to the President's bi-partisan impeachment in the House of Representatives.
I'm going to take a day for the liberals hyperventilating over the Judge Alito nomination to find some paper bags and calm down, then I'll be back for some, hopefully, intelligent comments on what the Left would have you believe is a "radical" judge. If you can't handle the graphic description of a scissor in the skull of an unborn baby you might want to miss my next post (oh, and yes, you'd be considered a "radical", too, for being offended by such a practice).
posted by Zack at 7:29 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home